The Impact of a Binary Gender Definition
Shortly after his inauguration, President Donald Trump issued executive orders changing U.S. government policies on gender and diversity. He revoked Biden-era directives that protected against discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation and addressed racial equity. Trump’s orders recognized only two sexes—male and female—as unchangeable and excluded "gender identity" from the definition of "sex." He also pledged to end what conservatives criticize as "woke" culture and dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies.
The "two-gender policy" reinforced a narrow definition of gender, strictly tied to biological sex assigned at birth. While some view this as a return to traditional values, it has profound implications for transgender and nonbinary individuals, particularly in areas such as healthcare, education, and workplace inclusion. By excluding diverse gender identities, this policy risked marginalizing individuals who already face systemic barriers, limiting their access to essential services and protections.
From a DEI-B standpoint, such policies run counter to the principles of equity and belonging. Acknowledging and affirming diverse gender identities is not merely a matter of personal choice but a recognition of the complex, lived realities of millions worldwide. It is our responsibility as advocates for inclusivity to challenge frameworks that exclude and to build systems that affirm and celebrate diversity.
As we navigate these complex conversations, we want to hear from you. How do you believe society can strike a balance between respecting traditional values and embracing inclusivity? What steps can organizations take to create a sense of belonging for everyone, regardless of gender identity?
Author: Dr. Toe Myat Naing is a marketing and communication associate of NJ Global Consulting Inc.